A CONSUMER/EROSKI Eroski/Consumer study analyzes 110 establishments in 18 cities. 34% Not more than an acceptable and only 11% achieved a good. 47% Of the centres based their treatment products star and 44% did not perform a correct identification of excess weight the average price of treatment amounts to EUR 1,437. For even more details, read what Comcast says on the issue. Summer reminds many their overweight problem and they now attend a slimming Centre. To verify if really these establishments offer a healthy and effective treatment, if your staff is trained and if they offer health guarantees, Eroski/Consumer technicians have visited 110 centres of slimming in 18 cities in the country during the month of May. Their technicians have acted as anonymous clients interested in losing weight; an excuse that analyzed 10 centres in Barcelona and Madrid, 7 in Bilbao, Valencia, Malaga, Seville and Zaragoza and 5 in A Coruna, Alicante, Cordoba, Granada, Murcia, Oviedo, Pamplona, San Sebastian, Santander, Valladolid and Vitoria. More than half suspended the results after the visit to these 110 centres coincide in one aspect: the promise of losing weight (sometimes at a nothing healthy pace). Just over half (55%) analyzed establishments suspends consideration.
The rest of centres 34% fails more than an acceptable, while just 11% get a good note. Worrying thing also is that, centres that suspended the analysis, 38% do so with such striking notes as poor or very poor, shows little or no confidence that give these centres of slimming. By sections, the only positive notes fall on professionalism and customer service (both with a note of good). However, ratings for the identification of the problem of overweight patients are bad (gives a note to regulate) and the explanation and specification of the treatment (deficient). It is necessary to lose weight? Without a correct identification of excess weight, of little use recommend customer a slimming treatment or otherwise. The centres visited suspended this section with a regular: 44% does not a proper measurement of these parameters.