The action of Morocco in the Sahara has bought an unusual and overflowing concern by the human rights. It seems to me very well. Until very selective people in its homings, like the film directors of lefts, they have been disappointed with the deliberate quietismo of Rodriguez Zapatero in this subject: " Saying that the diplomatic relation is over the defense of the human rights would have to shame the president, to all the Gobierno" , an indignant Javier Bardem has said. But we do not have to fall in the deceit: this mobilization and this to wake up of brings back to consciousness is sporadic and concrete. It is just like the temporary welcome of Spanish families to minors saharauis so that they delouse in summer and they enjoy the municipal swimming pools. And why is not made equal with boy-welded of Sierra Leone or mutilated by the mines the anti-person in Cambodia? He is that the same to which scandalizes the attitude of Mohamed I SAW soon laugh to them thanks to Fidel and Raul I castrate.
And who supported the boycott to the South Africa of the apartheid protests now by timid blockade to the repressive Cuban regime. Why they are silent, in addition, before the horror of Korea de Kim Jon-il, the dictatorship of Mugabe in Zimbabwe or the terrible situation of the women in so many and so many Islamic countries? It is that, for some, the human rights are strictly selective. Even, from his comfortable parnaso leftist, they forget next: those thousand of shamefully begging unemployed whom they only take care of Caritas and other denominational organizations to whom they indeed scorn. Original author and source of the article.