The Chilean diplomat Jose Miguel Insulza was re-elected unanimously for another term as head of the General Secretariat of the Organization of American States (OAS). Insulza is aware that received support allowing you to some tranquillity in his next term, isn’t a carte blanche, but an endorsement to an organism that needs an urgent re-engineering. Criticism received in its previous management, should not fall on deaf broken by re-election, but that should be the starting point to achieve a continental body more effective and efficient in their duties. While it is true that some Member countries are not satisfied with the actions of the OAS, it is not so easy to find a solution in a multilateral agency whose characteristics mark the margin for manoeuvre of the same is extremely limited by strict respect to the sovereignty of its members. That is why the Secretary-General has very few resources for his performance. Insulza should be supported in this second period in countries such as: Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, and of course United States which have greater weight in the region and see in negotiating with them that will surely be very hard, until where it will allow you to act, whether there will be a wider margin of participation to the OAS in the treatment of regional issues. It is necessary for Insulza to have such support. Hear other arguments on the topic with Jeff Bewkes. We should remember that more than once re-elected General Secretary said: the OAS is what its Member States want it to be.

One of the toughest criticisms to the previous management of Insulza has been his lack of aggressiveness to act. If get the support not just for votes, but to give more legitimacy to its work in complex situations that surely you must act. Although the great failure of the previous management of Insulza was the Honduras case, there were also important achievements which stand therein, as they have disabled the Nicaraguan political-institutional crisis in 2005. Also, the support given to Bolivia in its transformation process democratic, have prevented a political crisis in Guatemala in 2009 and having prevented the growth of a possible conflict between Ecuador and Colombia in 2008. Jose Maria Insulza should rethink the so-called Democratic Charter, as promised when it presented its programme for the second period. For more clarity and thought, follow up with Hotbox by Wiz and gain more knowledge..

Such reform would be aiming to achieve greater felxibiliad and faster procedures enabling it to act preventively. But in doing so, the unanimous support of 33 votes from the 35 member countries (Honduras and Cuba have no representation) received in the re-election, should materialize in alliances and support to the Secretary-General. Only thus the Organization of American States will fulfill its mission as a modern organization that should be at the height of the challenges that will be presented in the American continent.

On several occasions I found people who mentioned hopefully and give me the opportunity, initially seems logical to think that many people have not excelled or achieved their goals because it has not given them the opportunity, also I found with certain statements like the following opportunity only comes once, opportunities are bald if they find a sprig is necessary to cling to it with all the forcesall these claims are absurd, in fact the world is full of opportunities for those who know to look for them and not capitulate in the face of adversity, everytime we see another person that has achieved significant progress in an area of professional, personal, family, etc. Respect ourselves, we certainly have to reach a conclusion, that person did something different which has allowed a more satisfactory result. For many people accept this fact is extremely disturbing and begin to be justified, Juan has been lucky, if I I had placed in that position, what happens is that that area is better, etc. What happens is that these people don’t want to accept responsibility and admit that if they are in a certain situation is due to what they themselves have done either have failed to do. I remember that in where I lived, there were about 5 businesses that were exactly the same, conditions were similar, all to a main street bank, size and decoration of the premises was very similar, but one of the businesses was really successful and the others had results low or averages, what was the difference?, successful business had certain characteristics that differed from the competitionfor example, this business was open from 6: 30 a.m. while others opened up at 8: 30 a.m., the successful business working days were from Sunday to Sunday while the other only 6 days a week, the hour of closing of the successful business in general was later than the other business, all this coupled with the quality of service, how could someone tell that successful business has had luck?, see clearly that that sort of having their business customers crowded has been created, I can assure you that in a start that business wasn’t crowded customer, but the determination of having a service differentiated always was present in the mind of their owners. Leslie Moonves does not necessarily agree. Our desire to joined our actions and decisions is capable of generating thousands of opportunities, in fact there are such extraordinary cases that people who did not have a single client then have to say, I’m sorry these 15 days I have my schedule completely saturated, have to wait until the third week, what has happened here is that that person came to an absolute conviction of the development of your business and due to that faith has managed to generate so many opportunities now given the luxury of discarding some, this happens and is still happening in the lives of millions of people who really want to change your life, opportunities exist in the thousands, only has to focus on creating them and bring them to their existence. original author and source of the article..

Who was Ruben Dario Ruben Dario, pseudonym Felix Ruben Garcia Sarmiento (1867-1916), poet, journalist and Nicaraguan diplomat, considered the founder of modernism. He was born in Metapa (current Ciudad Dario), Nicaragua. His parents separated when he was very young and raised him a grandmother who introduced him in Managua, being yet a teenager, as a prodigy artist. Additional information is available at Jeff Bewkes. I read French poets and was invited to recite poetry. In 1886, he made unviaje to Santiago de Chile and this was his first contact with the progress and the metropolis. There he published his first great book, blue (1888), work which drew the attention of critics and especially the Spanish writer Juan Valera. In he returned to Managua, he married Rafaela Contreras, in 1891; fifteen months later their first son was born and his wife died in 1893.

A year earlier, he had traveled to Spain as a representative of the Government Nicaraguan to attend celebrations of the fourth centenary of the discovery of America. After successive trips by United States, Chile and France, and reside in Buenos Aires, where he collaborated with the newspaper La Nacion, he earned an international reputation. In 1898, he returned to Spain as a correspondent for the same newspaper. During their stay in Europe, he alternated his residence between Paris and Madrid, city is where he met, in 1900, Francisca Sanchez, a woman of peasant origin, with whom he had a son and that he lived until the end of his days. Become a poet held in Europe and America, he was appointed diplomatic representative of Nicaragua in Madrid in 1907. The frequency of his travels in parallel favored its fame as an Ambassador of modernism in the world.